Fr. Francis Bach – Diocese of Harrisburg

| Nov 12, 2018 | Abuser Profiles, Catholic Church

Fr. Francis Bach

Diocese of Harrisburg/Baltimore

Ordained: 1962

Relieved of youth-related duties: 1967

Resigned/Retired: 1994

Laicized: 2007

Died: 2010

Assignment History:

  • 1962-1964: St. Theresa (Cumberland, PA)
  • 1964-1965: St. Patrick (York, PA)
  • 1965-1970: St. Patrick’s Cathedral (Harrisburg, PA)
  • 1970: St. Joseph (Danville, PA)
  • 1970: Boy Scout Chaplain (appointed)
  • 1970: Family Life Apostolate (Diocese HQ)
  • 1971-1975: Millersville University
  • 1974-1975: St. Joan of Arc (Hershey, PA)
  • 1975-1976: St. Rose of Lima (York, PA)
  • 1976: Leave of Absence
  • 1976-1977: Annunciation BVM (McSherrystown, PA)
  • 1977-1980: Holy Family (Harrisburg, PA)
  • 1980-1983: Assumption BVM (Lebanon, PA)
  • 1983-1994: Assumption BVM/Our Lady of Fatima Mission (Lebanon, PA)
  • 1994: Resigned/retired

 

Summary of Allegations Against Fr. Francis Bach:

Fr. Francis Bach was a Catholic priest that worked in the Diocese of Harrisburg.  Much of the information about the allegations against Fr. Francis Bach comes from the 2007 laicization petition submitted by the Diocese of Harrisburg to the Vatican, seeking Bach’s removal from the priesthood.  In such a petition, the Diocese sets forth all the reasons that a priest should be returned to the lay state, similar to how a prosecutor would set forth facts supporting an indictment of a criminal defendant.

According to the petition, the Diocese of Harrisburg received a 1994 report of abuse by a man who said that Bach abused him as a 13-year-old boy in 1969.  Bach invited the boy to his boat in Maryland. In the middle of the night, the boy awoke to Bach fondling his penis, and it progressed to oral sex and taking photographs of the boy while he was naked.  Bach neither admitted nor denied the incident when confronted by Diocese officials; instead, he admitted that there were multiple incidents of similar behavior. He agreed to retire from active ministry, considering the scandal that could come to the Church if he continued in ministry.

Following his removal from ministry, Bach was sent to Villa St. John Vianney, a notorious pedophile priest treatment center in Downingtown, Pennsylvania.  During his evaluation, he admitted to abusing at least 14 boys aged 14-16 during his priesthood.

In 2002, the Diocese of Harrisburg received a new report from a man who was also abused on Bach’s boat in Maryland and at the Cathedral in Harrisburg during the 1970s.

In 2007, another man contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg, who reported multiple instances of sexual abuse by Bach.  At the time, the man was 12. No details were provided by the grand jury as to the date or Bach’s parish assignment during the time. The incidents with this boy occurred at a motel and included sodomy of the child. He was later abused on Bach’s boat as well.

In 2009, yet another man reported his sexual abuse by Bach to the Diocese of Harrisburg.  He reported that he, too, was taken to a motel on multiple occasions and sexually assaulted by Bach, including sodomy.  When confronted with this allegation, Bach responded that he could not remember the incidents but, “with my history, anything is possible.  I’m not saying he is fabricating the story.” Bach’s assignment at the time of the abuse was not provided by the grand jury.

In 2016, another many contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg to report being abused in 1960 as an 8-year-old altar boy at St. Patrick in York, Pennsylvania.

According to the grand jury report and several victims of Fr. Joseph Peas, Bach and Pease owned a boat together and often used it to abuse boys.  The two were also known to “share” victims.

According to the 2007 laicization petition, the Diocese of Harrisburg did not want the matter to be subject to a Canonical trial because it could bring scandal to the Church if the allegations were aired.  Bishop Rhodes wrote, “…the true reason Francis Bach left all priestly ministry is unknown to others. If his case is now brought to trial or given any kind of publicity, I fear it will cause scandal to many, as he is still a priest who is beloved by many in our diocese.”  The Vatican agreed, and Bach was eventually laicized quietly.

While the petition does not mention any incidents during these time periods, there are multiple red flags in Bach’s assignment history that suggest, in our experience, that the Diocese of Harrisburg was aware of allegations against Bach well before 1994.  In 1967, he was relieved of all duties relating to Youth Ministry, which is certainly unusual unless there was concern about his interaction with the children he encountered. Moreover, he has an unexplained leave of absence in 1976 that does not appear to be for any type of educational or professional development.  In our experience, the length and abruptness of the leave certainly suggest that it may have been related to allegations of abuse. Of course, these issues would be examined more closely in litigation to determine the reason for these maneuvers with certainty.

Bach died in 2010.

Fr. Bach’s name appears on the Archdiocese of Baltimore’s Credibly Accused of Sexual Abuse of Minors list. In April 2023, Maryland’s Attorney General released a report alleging 156 Catholic clergy members sexually abused at least 600 children over six decades. The report lists the names of the abusers, including Fr. Bach.

Horowitz Law is a law firm representing victims of sexual abuse in the Diocese of Harrisburg and throughout Pennsylvania.  The Diocese of Harrisburg filed for federal bankruptcy protection in February 2020. Anyone sexually abused by a priest or employee of the Diocese of Harrisburg may be entitled to file a claim against the Diocese in these bankruptcy proceedings, but very strict filing deadlines apply.  Most victims of abuse in the Diocese of Harrisburg will never be able to take action against the Diocese of Harrisburg if they miss this bankruptcy filing deadline, so it is important that you contact us immediately to discuss your potential case.

Contact us at 888-283-9922 or [email protected] to discuss your legal options today.

mailto:[email protected]