Tag: Archdiocese of Boston

diocese of buffalo sexual abuse priest

The Buffalo Diocese: Another Boston?

In 2002, cracks emerged in the nearly ironclad shield constructed by the Boston Catholic hierarchy that had securely hidden thousands of child sex crimes by hundreds of clerics.

Thanks to brave victims, whistleblowers and journalists, eventually a horror was revealed that few thought possible.

Now, almost two decades later, the same seems to be happening in the Buffalo diocese.

In both cases, after each stunning revelation of wrongdoing, parishioners, victims and observers were left wondering “When will this ever come to an end?

And in both cases, ‘the end’ almost never seems to come.

Let’s look more closely at the disturbing parallels.

In both cities, a seemingly disproportionate number of abuse and cover up lawsuits were filed (Right now, the Buffalo diocese faces more than 250 cases.)

https://www.wkbw.com/news/i-team/facing-250-sex-abuse-lawsuits-diocese-of-buffalo-declares-bankruptcy

In both cities, church officials deceptively played down the number of accused priests.

In both cities, much of the credit for shedding light into these dark places goes to determined journalists (in Buffalo, Charlie Specht and Jay Tokasz; in Boston, the Globe’s Spotlight Team and later, the staff of the Boston Herald and other outlets).

In both cities, courageous women church employees who saw deceit and corruption and became influential whistleblowers by ‘going public’ with incriminating evidence when their consciences could no longer bear silence (Sr. Catherine Mulkerrin in Boston and Siobhan O’Connor in Buffalo).

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/Whistleblowers/#Mulkerrin

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2018/09_10/2018_10_28_Bill_Minutes_Whistleblower_says.htm

In both cities, clergy themselves ‘turned on’ their boss, the bishop. (In Boston, nearly 60 priests publicly called for Law to resign. In Buffalo, Fr. Ryszard Biernat secretly recorded private conversations with Bishop Malone and shared information with reporters. Other Buffalo priests were openly critical of Malone.)

https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2020/03/whistle-blower-priest-seeks-lifting-of-suspension-imposed-by-disgraced-bishop/

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/obituaries/cardinal-bernard-law-dead.html

In both cities, priests who were promoted to higher positions elsewhere were dogged by allegations of their wrongdoing in their home dioceses. (Several former Boston priests became bishops – including John McCormack of New Hampshire and William Murphy of Long Island – and came under serious fire for their actions back in Massachusetts. Fr. Donald Trautman of Buffalo later became the Bishop of Erie and was accused in a lawsuit last year of protecting an accused Buffalo molester, Fr. Michael Freeman.)

https://www.goerie.com/news/20190618/eries-trautman-accused-over-buffalo-abuse-complaints

In both cities, a veteran prelate ended up resigning (Cardinal Bernard Law in Boston, Bishop Richard Malone in Buffalo).

In both cities, their short-term replacements struggled to ‘right the ship’ but were also embroiled in controversies.

(In Boston, Bishop Richard Lennon argued on camera with the brother of an abuse victim, telling him “You’re a sad little man.”

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2007/01_02/2007_01_31_ClevelandScene_TheGodly.htm

And in Buffalo, Bishop Edward Scharfenberger is being attacked for not returning calls to a survivor and letting suspended and accused predator priests say Mass.)

https://www.wkbw.com/news/i-team/survivors-stunned-after-bishop-scharfenberger-celebrates-mass-with-abusive-priests

We could go on and on.

But there’s a key difference between the two dioceses. Boston’s crisis erupted nearly two decades ago. Buffalo’s erupted much more recently.

So current and former Buffalo church staffers (especially Bishop Robert Cunningham, Bishop Edward Kmiec, Bishop Joseph Mansell, Bishop Edward Grosz) had years to learn from their Boston colleagues and predecessors (Cardinal Humberto Medeiros, Cardinal Sean O’Malley and of course Cardinal Law).

Sadly, they didn’t. And they still aren’t.

ADDENDUM: Since we at Horowitz Law began writing this blog, another Buffalo priest has been suspended because of a credible report that he molested a child in 2011. He’s Fr. Peter J. Karalus, essentially the second-in-command at the diocese as its ‘vicar general.’

https://www.wgrz.com/article/news/religion/diocese-of-buffalo-puts-priest-on-leave-over-2011-allegation/71-65dd8f3b-660b-46a5-9f79-f82d193967c0

https://www.wnycatholic.org/news/article/current/2020/03/21/103906/bishop-sharfenberger-places-fr.-peter-karalus-on-administrative-leave

Fr. James Shaughnessey – Diocese of Harrisburg

Fr. James Shaughnessey

Diocese of Harrisburg

Ordained: 1937

Absent on Sick Leave: 1941-1944

Assigned in the Archdiocese of Boston: 1964-1989

Retired (in good standing): 1977

Died: 1989

Assigned in Harrisburg as follows:

  • 1937-1941          St. Mary of the Assumption (Lebanon, PA)
  • 1941-1944          Absent on Sick Leave
  • 1944-1945          St. Lucy (Waltonville, PA)

Summary of Sexual Abuse Allegations against Fr. James Shaughnessey:

Father James Shaughnessey’s name appears on the Diocese of Harrisburg’s 2018 list of accused priests.  According to the Diocese of Harrisburg, his name is listed not because he was accused of abuse in the Diocese of Harrisburg, but rather because he was accused of abusing children in the Archdiocese of Boston.

That Shaughnessey spent three years of his young career in Harrisburg absent on sick leave is certainly a red flag that needs additional scrutiny.  While the designation in the Official Catholic Directory is not itself conclusive of sexual misconduct, that is the designation most often used to identify accused priests who are sent for inpatient treatment and aftercare following allegations of abuse.  The transfer to the Archdiocese of Boston following that sick leave is also suspicious for the same reasons.  It is not uncommon for an accused priest to be barred from ministry in his home diocese following repeated allegations, such that they need to find a “benevolent bishop” in another diocese to take them in if they wish to continue in the priesthood.  Whether that was the case with Shaughnessey would require additional investigation into the records maintained by both dioceses.

Once Shaughnessey left for the Archdiocese of Boston, he never returned to ministry in Harrisburg.

According to the Archdiocese of Boston, Shaughnessey died in 1989.

Horowitz Law is a law firm representing victims of sexual abuse in the Diocese of Harrisburg and throughout Pennsylvania.  The Diocese of Harrisburg filed for federal bankruptcy protection in February 2020. Anyone sexually abused by a priest or employee of the Diocese of Harrisburg may be entitled to file a claim against the Diocese in these bankruptcy proceedings, but very strict filing deadlines apply.  Most victims of abuse in the Diocese of Harrisburg will never be able to take action against the Diocese of Harrisburg if they miss this bankruptcy filing deadline, so it is important that you contact us immediately to discuss your potential case.   

Contact us at (888) 283-9922 or adam@adamhorowitzlaw.com to discuss your legal options today.